Site Navigation Skip Navigation Links.
View Subscription Details: Letter ( 03/08/2005 ) - HTML Format

In this newsletter I will give you information about my approach to energy savings. I have done extensive research in energy efficiency of industrial refrigeration and I believe that I have found a cost – effective way to save energy. Idea of my approach is to save maximum energy with minimum investment. I believe that every manager and every chief engineer is interested in this approach. Let me show you the difference between traditional approach to energy savings and cost – effective approach.

Traditional energy efficiency project involve 2 steps:

  1. Energy audit to identify energy saving measures, estimation of implementation of these measures and estimation of potential payback. This step will give you direction of your investment to improve efficiency of a refrigeration plant. Usually it will cost you from $ 5,000 to $10,000.
  2. Implementation of energy saving measures identified by energy audit.  This step involve significant (commonly more than $100,000) investment and has a payback, usually 2-3 years. You have to by expensive equipment (PLC, VFD and etc.) to achieve energy savings identified by mentioned audit. Make sure that you have optimum set points and operating strategies to maximize efficiency of your refrigeration plant.

I am proposing a cost – effective approach to improve efficiency of refrigeration plants.


This approach involves 3 steps:

  1. Housekeeping. Energy efficiency actions are done by operating engineers of refrigeration plant, based on their knowledge and experience. It is a very good first step to energy efficient refrigeration plant, because you just have to encourage your engineers to save energy. Typical savings at this step are 5-10 %. Payback is less than 1 month.
  2. Low cost investment. Energy efficiency actions are done by consultant to improve efficiency of existing refrigeration plant without major capital investment. This step involves an optimization of operating strategies and operating set points. Typical savings at this step are 8-12 %. Payback is usually 1-2 months.
  3. Retrofitting. Investment in energy saving equipment (PLC, VFD and etc.) can save you additional 10 % of your energy use. Payback is typically 2-3 years.

Every step in this process will be more and more expensive. At step 1, you probably have to pay just bonuses to your engineers. At step 2, usually your expenses are only a consulting fee. Payback at this stage is 1-2 months, because this fee is commonly around 10 % of total cost for energy efficiency project. At step 3, you have to buy energy saving equipment. Choose the right set points and right operating strategies to maximize efficiency of this equipment; otherwise you will not get energy savings that were expected.

I believe that step by step improvement of efficiency of refrigeration plant is much better approach, because first two steps have very short payback and only at last step significant capital investment is required.

  © 2002-2021 SKEnergy.Ca.  Designed & Powered by © CSNet Inc.  All rights reserved.